Who Took the Humph?

,
How many of the Humphledinck Singers remain?

Find me a bandwagon and I’ll jump on it.

Ulster’s current band orchestra leader appears to have limped from the bandstand, without it must be said, much of a fanfare from the watching cast on the Terrace…

…but what of our other orchestra leader? He is very much in the forgotten man of Ulster rugby mode at the minute with not even the usual pack of dogs round the lamp-post able to cast light on his whereabouts.

Someone has taken the Humph or should I say, one of our tens is missing.

It would be fair to assume that the missing 10 is unhurt as he does not appear on the casualty lists published by UR at end of every squad announcement.

One must assume, without bothering to forensically dissect, that there is either a cunning plan to unveil an unpractised Humph on an unsuspecting Italian team or that he is parked in a UR backwater for crimes against UR or someone in the UR hierarchy.

Our backline needs to spark. On Friday night we seemed to want to get the ball early to Trimble, as if somehow or other the Glasgow defence, instead of crabbing across field would perhaps develop wooden legs and fail to deal with Trimble’s threat.

There was no doubting the speed of the ball coming out as we had a world class 9 operating from the base of the scrum, therefore one must assume other facets of play blunted our offensive strategy.

Put another way, the speed of thought required for the game we seem to want to play is available through mini Humph who despite his other much publicised and discussed technical failings, is the kind of player who will galvanise the backline.

I was passing the burger van at Ravenhill on Friday and heard this plaintive song coming from a small compartment to its rear. Very muffled, the words unclear but it’s plain to see someone wants to play.

Please release me can’t you see,

You’d be a fool not to play me,

to stop me now would bring us pain,

So release me, let me play again.*

*As sung by Ianglebert Humphledinck.

Winning Whilst Wondering

At the risk of repetition, as Dewi said, I said, it’s all about who is playing well come next April and May when the business end of the League and Heineken is underway. Gone is the inconsistency of last season to be replaced by a dogged sometimes almost dull approach and with it a winning momentum.

We are failing to play anywhere near our true potential but managing to achieve victory where once we would have fallen on the altar of doubt and lost.

Conversely we are perhaps running ourselves down on the altar of the previous season’s false dawns and doubts.

To elaborate…

Glasgow will no doubt have looked at our team list and saw a hatful of internationals and the odd world class player. I speak from experience when I say that running out on the park against ex internationals and well known senior players made you lift your game.

 It could have a positive effect and act as a galvaniser to your game. Alternatively you could curl up and die. Most individuals lift their game in an effort not to be humiliated. Glasgow for my money were in that frame of mind. There was a determination not to be used as whipping boys in the League and it worked.

Ulster must be aware that teams are looking at their team list in the way that we looked at the Ospreys or Munster’s team list. It’s a new experience for us to be viewed as a major team in the big boys ‘shark pool’.

That’s my theory.

Mad Muller’s Theory of Positivity

Couldn’t help but be enticed by Muller World at Meet the Bokkers on Tuesday. Here was the 6’ 7” ex Springbok at his most congenial, relaxed, atop a stool and in front of an expectant audience he was the epitome of man in control of his sporting destiny.

Here are the mad Muller’s top 3 positive thoughts.

1. To barbecue twice a week in Ulster’s unpredictable weather. (By the way Johann, Lidl were doing a South African sausage offer the other week my sources have informed me.)

2. Get out of the group stages of the Heineken and no reason not to progress to the final!!

3. Beat Rory McIlroy at golf.

There’s something I like about this. Item 3 may be a bit tongue in cheek but the guy’s got balls of steel and the persona to carry them off in public.

Business Case Required.

Even though I’d finished my cornflakes the other morning, it failed to halt me dreaming about winning the lottery and a few million quid.

Having realised my dream, I decided I would join the URSC and invest some money for them to build a new and better hut at the end of the beer tabernacle at Ravenhill.

This would be a small covered stand with all weather protection and new counter facilities.

I approached my accountant who’d I’d placed in charge of my newly earned millions and asked him, was there any reason I couldn’t invest a couple of quid in the Ulster Rugby Supporter’s Club and other sporting entities linked to UR such as the UAFC and the FRU.

My accountant, a man named Bob, from McCausland, McGovern & Dubbin was unequivocal, that I first had to produce a business case to support my efforts to support these sporting bodies. Further, he informed me, he was unhappy with organisational structures in the Supporter’s Club.

The man at the helm of the supporters club would have to go before any money would be handed over Bob announced. Furthermore, the supporters club would have to review their structures and I would need to investigate past failings before they got their money or indeed the other sporting bodies I wanted to support would get theirs.

I was aghast and depressed in equal measure. I knew the FRU had big plans for expansion and that the UAFC was a smoothly run organisation with a top class website.

The URSC though, was an organisation with a megalomaniac at the helm, with a lifetime’s bus pass to the presidency. Then there were the strange cases of the no. 32 bus and a man called Stan amongst other things.

With no sign of the head man stepping down amidst previous unheralded grass roots support from the likes of the second class barrier crew and weather eye for the meedya, my money will remain in my pocket and the FRU and UAFC won’t be getting any funds either.

“All because of themuns’ in the URSC who don’t have greater good of sport and website owners at heart,” snorted BJ Bloggins of the Sunday Mirth.

Got A Quotaful

As someone who lives in a country which has quotas to redress employment imbalances and been the subject of employment quotas with all its pernicious foibiles in the field of promotion and opportunity, I was disheartened to read the latest nonsense from South Africa.

ABSA (one of SA’a leading banks I understand) and sponsor of the Currie Cup were letting it be known through an e-mail from its vice president, that they (as articulated by the VP,) were far from happy about the number of blacks playing in the top five teams in the Currie Cup.

There weren’t enough apparently, whilst the less successful teams, with more of a quota of blacks were not doing so well in the CC. ABSA made threatening noises to SARU about withdrawing sponsorship of the CC unless the imbalance, as they saw it, was redressed.

The banks long standing customers, were it seems, drawn from the Afrikaner population and there was talk of accounts being withdrawn in protest and some were I understand. Cue the sound of crunching reverse gears as ABSA gently backed down and the matter withdrew from public , like curtains being drawn at night.

That is the gist of it anyway. What I found so hilarious and probably many black players found equally depressing was the fact that the top five most successful teams in the CC had fewer blacks playing for them than the least successful ones, a point helpfully publicised by ABSA.

The aim of ABSA therefore one assumes was to make the competition more exciting and level the playing field by introducing more black players to the top teams or more likely the fulfilling of quotas in the name of transformation.

A novel idea this from a bank, who I’m sure fully played its role in helping to put the world’s biggest economies into reverse gear by questionable transactions and the interminable greed of its upper echelons.

They really need to get their own house in order and demonstrate responsibility before trying to reform others.

The Winner Caps it All

There was no contest in this week’s sartorial award for worst dressed supporter. With Kimble out of the running because of good weather, meaning he couldn’t tie his hoodie hood up with the bandana, the field was clear for Moondance to claim this week’s award.

A consistent performer all season, he was a clear winner with his baseball cap perched atop his head as if it were a union soldier’s cap still aloft after a battle.

Dewi and Ragin’ Raven were never in contention, being far too well dressed, with not even a pithy whiff of Smithy this week from Dewi. Disappointing there is so little competition for MD but then again I haven’t seen John E King about yet.

Confused

Talking of which. This weeks FRU site featured a picture of a middle aged man solemnly sitting behind a laptop and drew the headline of ‘the man behind the smile’.

Adjacent this URSC article there featured a half mugshot of a middle aged man smiling wickedly and drew a headline of, ‘Ulster Rugby announce team for Glasgow.’ Surely there is some mix up here but then again, do we really want to know anything about the grinning John E King?

Casualty by Twitter

A new and immediate form of injury update on UR’s players has emerged in recent times. The players themselves will update you on twitter at the blink of an eye and a drop of their beanie hat.

UR’s senorious and infrequent injury updates are like an old rerun of Open All Hours, way behind the times and completely irrelevant.

Next time you need to know how BJ’s hand is doing or Ferris’s shoulder is shaping up, just check their twitter sites!


20 responses to “Who Took the Humph?”

  1. junty

    Dear admin…. on a point of law and order – you have stated

    “Anything longer will be automatically truncated …”

    I think that under the human rights act of 2013 section 7 paragraph 4 ……
    where it states that
    ” Even though someone is talking or writing cr@p they are perfectly entitled to talk or write such cr@p” …. ” any means of censoring this could be construed as a breach of their human rights but this must be taken before the supreme high court to hear all the evidence and thus decide on any action to take……….

    Also if it is too long and is automatically truncated……………… Is this painful ???

  2. Raging Raven

    Oh I give up you clearly have issues.

    All the best Mote.

    I will not be commenting on any of your posts in the future.

  3. the mote

    RR

    DiD we or did we not play a creative outhalf last year who had a weak defence ?

    Did we score a lot of trys ?

    Did we have a better than average allotment of try bonus points?

    Did we lose more matches than we won ?

    Did we end up third from bottom ?

    If the answer to all those questions is yes

    Who is talking to the wall ?

  4. Raging Raven

    Mote zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

    I might as well to to the wall.

  5. the mote

    Key point –defence is the key to sucess

    last year IH played 16 out of 18 games Ulster lost 10 Ulster were the second highest try scorers and had 4 try bonus points– finish 3rd from bottom

    if that is sucess RR I stand corrected

  6. Right guys – some of these comments are just too long.

    From now on all comments are restricted to 750 characters which should be 10 – 12 lines of text.

    Anything longer will be automatically truncated …

  7. Raging Raven

    No Mote I regard your assertion that EVERY team and EVERY coach have the same approach to the game regardless of the opposition. Which I believe is a load of cr@p. Every game is different because of the opposition,venue,weather,injuries, result required , ie 4pt win,5pt win loosing bonus point etc

    You should read what you write instead of trying to justify something else with meaningless statistics.

  8. the mote

    while games may differ RR the approach is the same — the first piority is defence and the minimisation of errors and the elimination of risk.

    In the Magners league thus far the average number of trys per team is 9.5 in 5 games which is le approx 2 per match. only the Scarlets and Ospreys average 3 a game for and Aironi and the Dragons average 3 a match against and they are the bottom two teams in the league

    Only the Ospreys with 4 trys against show a better defence than Ulster.

    While you may consider the idea as cr@p the stastics support the fact defence is the key to success

  9. Raging Raven

    Yes Ballpark and you obviously read mine! 🙂 Team exactly as predicted. 🙂 🙂

  10. ballpark

    Mote, Mote, Mote! I was not comparing respective positions but referring to the predilection of Irish rugby journos and supporters for typecasting someone based on a few performances, Denis Hickie being a good example.

    All will be revealed this Friday evening IMHO.

    I’m beginning to believe McGlocks read my blog!!!

  11. Raging Raven

    Cheers Junty. 🙂

    Everyone knows the importance of a solid defence even the posters on this site!

    Lets hope Humph has a good game.

  12. junty

    RR – to be honest I was agreeing with the comments about Humph, but will take the critisism fairly on the chin, of agreeing to ‘all the comments ‘ as I didn’t specifically mention that I agreed with the comments relating to Humph.
    I believe that defence is a very important part of the game and no team can afford to miss tackles as this creates space somewhere along the line as someone else in the defence has to plug the gap that has been left. Also every game should be approached with a different view as to what the likely outcome is going to be.

  13. Raging Raven

    “Every team –every coach — in the Magners has the same approach to the game regardless of the opposition .” …… the word according to Mote

    What a load of crap. Every game is different. There are some matches were the priority is to score 4 tries or more and win and not ground out a 3 nil win with the emphasis on defence as stated by Mote.

    I can’t believe you agree with this Junty.

  14. the mote

    Hichie was a wing not an outhalf a fast cover defence can lessen the impact of a weak wing and the opposition have to get the ball out to the wing to exploit a weak winger and many a winger has gone on to a pitch and not received a pass in a game eg McIlwaine played on the wing how many passes did he receive –two three at the most.

    But if the opposition can attack midfield assure of getting over the gain line then your forwards are going to be defending going backwards your backrow is going to get caught in the ruck and maul and your cover defence becomes thinner .

    The exploition of a known weakness is assured in the modern game and I see no point whatsoever of providing the opposition with opportunity to devise a winning tactic before they even kick a ball.

    I personnally would play Pienaar at out outhalf and Marshall or Porter at scrum half rather than Humphreys or Wallace at outhalf . Wallace’s lack of game time at outhalf was evident in the Connaught game were much of the kicking seem purposeless either through of kicking or misdirection.

    Ulster have been fortunate so far in not having to frequently defend in their own half going backwards I would hate to see that reversed in a ERC home match.

  15. Ballpark

    Chaps, perhaps i hanker for the instinctive rugby player who are a dying breed in an era of game management, not by the outhalf but by the coaches who devise plans to run the game by phases, moves, options which are more formulaic than an alegebra question.

    An instinctive player bypasses the best laid plans by a coach and therefore doesn’t always gain favour. I agree with you Mote that confidence can be shredded and heads go down etc. but when on song it is a sight to behold.

    The continual harping on about Humph’s defence is criminal and appears to be a pecularly Irish rugby thing. One remembers Hickie almost being ex – communicated when his opposite number,the evergreen stefan Terrablanche scored 4 tries for the Boks, not against Hickey but against Ireland.

    He paid the price with 4 years in the international wilderness and the interminable ah, but his defence is weak.

    If mystic Roost is to be believed then all will be revealed this Friday night and Ianglebert will be either deified or villified or both.

    BTW: I think kimble threatened me!!!!

  16. junty

    Mote – well said I agree with your comments. however i will add that when he is in form and gets his ‘tail up’ he can be very creative as he was in the home game against Stade last year in the H cup.

  17. glynncommando

    I think you may well be right, Rooster…..

  18. rooster

    I hear the ihumph has escaped from the cupboard in the burger van and is cleaning his kit ready for action this weekend.

  19. the mote

    Ballpark

    Every team –every coach — in the Magners has the same approach to the game regardless of the opposition . First priority is defence . Provided you can defend you are always in the game .

    One try, one penalty, one drop goal frequently being the difference between winning and losing

    A sound defence is of course wasted if in an attempt to play expansive rugby errors and mistakes are the order of the backs hence the approach is that of least risk — kick or take it into contact early.

    Those who wonder about the absence of the Humph make the fundamental error that attack is the most important aspect of the game.

    While the Humph is a creative player he is a player with both a weak defence and weak temperment . His style of play is ambitious and he demands a high level of performance from himself but one missed kick — one dropped pass — one bad pass out – a kick charged down a tackle missed and his confidence is diminished . Some if not many players when they make a mistake focus their aggression and take it out on the opposition . The Humph is not an aggressive player his frustation is internalised and therefore his performance suffers being an outhalf also does not help being in the middle of the park

    The other factor to take into account is that every team in the Magners league knows his defence is weak and therefore it is a major factor in their approach and tactics ito exploit and target that weakness Without IH the weakness in the Ulster team is much harder to identify and the approach adopted by the opposition could well be due to this fact.

    Ulster have played five games in the league and remain unbeaten — Humphreys has not started or appeared in one match that I think is a telling stastic the games have not been the great try fests but Ulster have yet to be beaten.

    I have watched from the terrace and replays on I Player my conclusion is that the failure in the backline could be due to the angle of run taken by O Connor he seems to take the ball running towards the gap between outhalf and first centre thus the backs are running diagonally across the field taking the defence with them -when the ball gets to the wing the wing has no space .

    O’Connor has to start running at the inside shoulder of his opposite number and engage the attention of the backrow thereby straightening the the backline and providing more space for the wings.

  20. the original kimble

    BP,

    Expext a letter from my solicitors, Sue, Grabbit and Runn. And if Dewi Barnes publishes that stuff about me behind the beer tent I’ll sue him as well….

    Then we’ll see who wears the big grin.

    tok

Corrections, comments or questions?

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.