ADVERTS

ADVERTS

Matt Williams, Ulster Rugby
Matt Williams, still looking for the answers!
Picture by www.rugbypicture.co.uk

Ulster’s revival came to a shuddering halt against a workman like Leinster side on a cold and frosty Saturday night at Ravenhill.

While Ulster have improved substantially in recent months, particularly in defence, there is still a substantial body of work to be done in attack or, perhaps more correctly, in choosing the correct moment to attack.

Ulster still seem to be having difficulty in coping with the ELV’s, particularly in the back three. Trimble and Nagusa appear to have trouble fielding kicks and neither appears to have the vision to run forcefully out of defence. Cunningham and Schifcoske are both very solid under the high ball but neither has the out and out pace required to make a decisive break. This invariably means that Ulster inevitably loose out the aerial battle that the new game appears to have become. Danielli would have had a field day in this game, but then perhaps Leinster would not have chosen to kick so much.

Against lesser sides Ulster’s agressive defence usually generates enough chances but if the opposition achieve parity, or better, at the breakdown then Ulster are struggling to make chances in the right areas of the field and this was the case against Leinster.

With the Leinster pack more than holding their own up front and little threat from the back three Ulster had few attacking options in the second half and this frustration led to Humphreys and Wallace taking reckless chances in their own half which gifted the game to Leinster. While Humphreys and Wallace have received a certain amount of stick over their decision making it would be perhaps more beneficial for Ulster to improve the positional play and attacking prowess of the back three.

If  Ulster can improve the threat from returning kicks then the rebuilding process will have taken another huge step forward. Let’s hope things improve for Thomond Park or it’s going to be a long night in Limerick.

KPICASA_GALLERY(UlsterVLeinster27thDecember2008)

ADVERTS
PRINTS

We now offer print, gift and download options for our images.

The ideal gift for all the family :)

Share.

1 Comment

  1. I think it is to easy to blame the Ulster Wingers for the failure to make ground out of defence that failure rests on a couple of factors
    firstly the !st kick by the Leinster outhalf was high in the middle resulting in a hurried return kick by IH deep into the leinster half – fielded by either Kearney or Dempsey who advanced 10/ 20 metres before kicking again done the touch line and following the kick thus if the wingers tried to run out of defence they were running into the on side Leinster forwards who invariably marked the advancing player with 2/3 tacklers ie the wingers lacked space to run out of defence and lacked insufficient support to ensure a quick recycle to allow the Ulster forwards to gain forward momentum

    The overall fact is not that Ulster played badly it was that Leinster knew the game plan they adopted and had in Kearney and Dempsey players to ensure that the pressure was maintained and the decision to give man of the match to Rocky Elsom was a mistake as the most influential player and key to Leinsters win was Kearney

Leave A Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.